May-June 1999
Volume 40 No. 3
Interpretation of Multiarray Induction Logs in Invaded Formations at
High Relative Dip Angles
Thomas D. Barber, Tracy Broussard, Gerald N. Minerbo, Zlatko Sijercic,
and David Murgatroyd
ABSTRACT: A new processing algorithm for multiarray induction tools
has been tailored for highly deviated wells. This algorithm provides the
same interpretation for invasion that has been available in the past only
in vertical wells.
The new algorithm is based on maximum-entropy inversion of the raw,
borehole-corrected array data through a fast 1D forward model. It allows
interpretation of multiarray induction logs even in the presence of invasion.
Tests on a wide range of invasion profiles computed with a 3D induction
forward model code at relative dip angles as high as 85° show that
the new inversion allows determination of Rxo, Rt, and the invasion profile
with similar accuracy to that determined in vertical wells. In theory the
process works to 90°; however, the current parameterization requires
that the wellbore cut all beds of interest.
Studies of sensitivity to incorrect dip angle show that in most cases
the relative dip must be known to ±5° to satisfy reasonable
petrophysical requirements. Sensitivity studies to other sources of error,
including coherent borehole noise, show that the new process has a sensitivity
to these effects similar to the current field processing. Because the nonlinear
response of induction arrays to conductivity is handled explicitly, and
without approximation, the new process also handles large shoulder-bed
contrasts without horns and overshoots at all apparent dip angles.
Application to field logs at a variety of relative dip angles confirms
that the results predicted from modeled data transfer to the real world,
producing Rt estimates that are fully corrected for dip effect.
An Integrated Approach to Determine Shale Volume and Hydrocarbon Potential
in Shaly Sands in the Gulf of Suez
G. M. Hamada
ABSTRACT: One of the most controversial problems in formation evaluation
in the Nubian Sandstone of the Zeit Bay Field, Gulf of Suez, is the shale
effect in the reservoir rocks. An accurate determination of formation porosity
and fluid saturation in shaly sand is subject to many uncertain parameters.
It is necessary to integrate information from several different log responses
using various interpretation models and local knowledge in order to accurately
estimate the desired formation properties. This note illustrates that a
conventional approach for handling the problem of shaly sand provides accurate
values of shale volume from different shale indicator tools and thereafter
a reliable effective porosity. Hydrocarbon saturation profiles have been
calculated using a laminated shale model. The validity of petrophysical
parameter values estimated by this integrated approach is confirmed by
a comparison with petrophysical properties measured on core samples collected
from shaly sand sections in the same wells.