Skip to main content
Home
About
Membership
Log on
Cart
Toggle search
Search
Toggle navigation
Search
Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts
Events
Toggle
Event List
Event Calendar
Annual Symposium
Event Roster
Publications
Toggle
SPWLA Today Newsletter
Petrophysics Journal
Publication Guidelines
Digital Papers
Publications Advertisement
Petrophysicists Covers
Resources
Toggle
Careers/Education
Frank S. Millard Training Center
Webinars/Videos
Petrophysics Skill Set Guidelines (PSSG)
SPWLA Nuggets of Wisdom
SPWLA The More You Know
YP Resources
Mnemonics
API Standards
Petrophysical Software Directory
Member Directory
Downloads
Glossary
Annual Symposium
Toggle
2023 Annual Symposium
Symposium Author Instructions
Manuscript Template
Chapters/SIGs
Toggle
Chapters
SIGs
Resources for Chapter Officers
Chapters at Large
Student Chapters
Distinguished Speaker Program
Foundation
Toggle
Make a Donation
Foundation Board Members
Foundation Overview
Grant and Scholarship Applications
Grants and Scholarship Recipients
Store
Toggle
Digital Papers
Books, CDs and more
Additional Membership Dues
Make A Donation
All
Volunteer Opportunities
Some Petrophysical Aspects Of The Mississippian "Chat" Glick
The Glick Field, Kiowa County, Kansas is one of several fields forming an arc around the southern end of the Central Kansas Uplift which produce from the so-called Mississippian "Chat". The "chat" (an old oil field term for tripolitic chert) varies in characteristics from field to field in this group but is remarkable in the Click Field for its high porosity, which ranges from 26 to 51 per cent. The chert, because of its porosity, most of which is not visible under the usual means of examination, exhibits some extremely low resistivities on the electric log plus other unusual petrophysical characteristics. Investigation by means of core analyses, capillary pressure curves, and thin sections indicate that in this field the permeability-saturation relationship of the chert rather than the porosity-saturation realtionships governs the productivity. Formation resistivity factors determined in the laboratory gave calculated cementation (m) factors of 2. 10 to 2. 75 with an average 2. 36. Porosity-saturation relationships were not well defined but tend to show that porosity below 15-20 per cent will be water filled. Free water level, i. e. , where capillary pressure is zero, calculations from capillary pressure curves do not agree with production tests and electric log calculations. The reason for this has not been firmly established.
Discounted member price:
1.00
Your price:
10.00
You could save:
90.0%
Quantity:
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##